Triple
T8057686
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | phenomenology |
E188041
|
entity |
| Predicate | emphasizesMethod |
P17414
|
FINISHED |
| Object | description rather than explanation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: description rather than explanation | Statement: [phenomenology, emphasizesMethod, description rather than explanation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: emphasizesMethod Context triple: [phenomenology, emphasizesMethod, description rather than explanation]
-
A.
hasEmphasis
chosen
Indicates that one element is given special stress, importance, or prominence relative to others.
-
B.
positionEmphasized
Indicates that a particular position, stance, or role is given special prominence or stress relative to others.
-
C.
mottoEmphasizes
Indicates that a motto highlights, stresses, or gives special importance to a particular idea, value, or theme.
-
D.
designEmphasizes
Indicates that a design intentionally places special importance or focus on a particular feature, principle, or aspect over others.
-
E.
emphasizesAttributeOfHermes
Indicates that something highlights or draws special attention to a particular attribute or characteristic of Hermes.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b2f68881908c50560697e210da |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cb3fa3dd2481909e925304fcea2111 |
completed | March 31, 2026, 3:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cb049a1b9c8190811c396421ebf9c9 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:25 p.m.