Triple
T8054329
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Royal Marriages Act 1772 |
E187757
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | British constitutional law |
C2534
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: British constitutional law Context triple: [Royal Marriages Act 1772, instanceOf, British constitutional law]
-
A.
United Kingdom constitutional law case
A United Kingdom constitutional law case is a judicial decision that interprets and applies the fundamental principles, structures, and limits of governmental power under the UK’s uncodified constitution.
-
B.
Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom
chosen
An Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom is a formal law enacted by the UK Parliament, comprising the House of Commons, the House of Lords, and the monarch, which has legal force throughout its applicable jurisdictions.
-
C.
British colonial law
British colonial law refers to the legal systems, statutes, and judicial practices imposed by Britain on its colonies, designed to maintain imperial control while selectively incorporating or reshaping local customs and institutions.
-
D.
Anglo-American political tradition
The Anglo-American political tradition is a lineage of political thought and institutions rooted in English common law, parliamentary government, and liberal constitutionalism that has shaped the democratic practices of Britain, the United States, and related societies.
-
E.
Act of Parliament of England
An Act of Parliament of England is a formal written law enacted by the English Parliament prior to the 1707 Acts of Union, having legal force within the Kingdom of England and its territories.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82b15e948190a62fd7af5218426a |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 5:25 p.m.