Triple
T770461
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rubinstein bargaining model |
E16268
|
entity |
| Predicate | solutionConcept |
P4453
|
FINISHED |
| Object | subgame perfect Nash equilibrium |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subgame perfect Nash equilibrium | Statement: [Rubinstein bargaining model, solutionConcept, subgame perfect Nash equilibrium]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: solutionConcept Context triple: [Rubinstein bargaining model, solutionConcept, subgame perfect Nash equilibrium]
-
A.
solutionType
chosen
Indicates the specific category or kind of solution associated with an entity or problem.
-
B.
demonstratedConcept
Indicates that an entity has shown, illustrated, or made evident a particular concept through example, explanation, or action.
-
C.
isSolutionOf
Indicates that one entity is a correct answer or satisfies the conditions of a given problem, equation, or task.
-
D.
introducedConcept
Indicates that one entity is responsible for presenting, defining, or bringing a new concept into use or awareness for another entity or context.
-
E.
challengedConcept
Indicates that one entity has questioned, disputed, or called into doubt the validity, accuracy, or applicability of a particular concept.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49369a0848190af883934cee3db4c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a704fb148190b203a5bdd77e961c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4a508c42c8190850a0ac7844a3ea9 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.