Triple

T7486225
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 393 U.S. 503 E176887 entity
Predicate fullCitation P17212 FINISHED
Object Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969) E33468 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969) | Statement: [393 U.S. 503, fullCitation, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)
Context triple: [393 U.S. 503, fullCitation, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)]
  • A. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District chosen
    Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case that established students do not lose their First Amendment free speech rights at school, so long as their expression does not substantially disrupt the educational environment.
  • B. Everson v. Board of Education
    Everson v. Board of Education is a 1947 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause to the states and articulated the modern “wall of separation between church and state” doctrine.
  • C. Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
    Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited student First Amendment rights by allowing public school officials greater authority to regulate school-sponsored student speech, such as in school newspapers.
  • D. Abington School District v. Schempp
    Abington School District v. Schempp is a 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that held mandatory Bible readings in public schools unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
  • E. Lee v. Weisman
    Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fullCitation
Context triple: [393 U.S. 503, fullCitation, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)]
  • A. hasFullCitation chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a complete and properly formatted bibliographic reference.
  • B. originalCitationForm
    Indicates the relationship where one form of a cited work is the initial or primary version from which other citation forms or variants are derived.
  • C. citationAs
    Indicates that one entity is cited or referenced in the role or capacity specified by another entity (such as a particular work, version, or context).
  • D. citationFormatIncludes
    Indicates that a particular citation format specification contains or incorporates a given element, rule, or component as part of its structure.
  • E. citationType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of citation relationship that one entity has to another (e.g., reference, quotation, acknowledgment).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f24ac508190bb98fe927c0bd065 completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f556955c8190bf014a065e04c5d8 completed March 27, 2026, 9:23 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c845fd62dc8190a64f5464a204c0d2 completed March 28, 2026, 9:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6f03eeaa88190a5215772ed05ee9f completed March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:42 p.m.