Triple
T7486225
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 393 U.S. 503 |
E176887
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullCitation |
P17212
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969) |
E33468
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969) | Statement: [393 U.S. 503, fullCitation, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969) Context triple: [393 U.S. 503, fullCitation, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)]
-
A.
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
chosen
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case that established students do not lose their First Amendment free speech rights at school, so long as their expression does not substantially disrupt the educational environment.
-
B.
Everson v. Board of Education
Everson v. Board of Education is a 1947 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause to the states and articulated the modern “wall of separation between church and state” doctrine.
-
C.
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited student First Amendment rights by allowing public school officials greater authority to regulate school-sponsored student speech, such as in school newspapers.
-
D.
Abington School District v. Schempp
Abington School District v. Schempp is a 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that held mandatory Bible readings in public schools unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
-
E.
Lee v. Weisman
Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fullCitation Context triple: [393 U.S. 503, fullCitation, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)]
-
A.
hasFullCitation
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a complete and properly formatted bibliographic reference.
-
B.
originalCitationForm
Indicates the relationship where one form of a cited work is the initial or primary version from which other citation forms or variants are derived.
-
C.
citationAs
Indicates that one entity is cited or referenced in the role or capacity specified by another entity (such as a particular work, version, or context).
-
D.
citationFormatIncludes
Indicates that a particular citation format specification contains or incorporates a given element, rule, or component as part of its structure.
-
E.
citationType
Indicates the specific kind or category of citation relationship that one entity has to another (e.g., reference, quotation, acknowledgment).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f24ac508190bb98fe927c0bd065 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f556955c8190bf014a065e04c5d8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c845fd62dc8190a64f5464a204c0d2 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 9:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6f03eeaa88190a5215772ed05ee9f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:42 p.m.