Triple
T7486071
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ronald H. Bradley et al. |
E176884
|
entity |
| Predicate | caseCitation |
P771
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974) |
E33464
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974) | Statement: [Ronald H. Bradley et al., caseCitation, Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974) Context triple: [Ronald H. Bradley et al., caseCitation, Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974)]
-
A.
Milliken v. Bradley
chosen
Milliken v. Bradley is a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the scope of school desegregation remedies by ruling that courts could not impose cross-district busing plans absent proof of interdistrict segregation.
-
B.
Regan v. Wald
Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
-
C.
Employment Division v. Smith
Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
-
D.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
E.
Katzenbach v. Morgan
Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c69f24ac508190bb98fe927c0bd065 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6f556955c8190bf014a065e04c5d8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c845fd62dc8190a64f5464a204c0d2 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 9:19 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:42 p.m.