Triple

T7475585
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fisher I E176623 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Grutter v. Bollinger E90995 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Grutter v. Bollinger | Statement: [Fisher I, relatedCase, Grutter v. Bollinger]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Grutter v. Bollinger
Context triple: [Fisher I, relatedCase, Grutter v. Bollinger]
  • A. Grutter v. Bollinger chosen
    Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the limited use of race as one factor in holistic law school admissions to promote educational diversity.
  • B. Gratz v. Bollinger
    Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
  • C. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
  • D. Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
    Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is a landmark 2023 U.S. Supreme Court case that sharply limited the use of race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, effectively ending affirmative action programs at colleges and universities nationwide.
  • E. Lee v. Weisman
    Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f41951348190a740b3957a73f825 completed March 27, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c8348561448190add358da0845fbee completed March 28, 2026, 8:05 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.