Triple

T6997718
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Norton E162259 entity
Predicate grapeSpeciesBackground P74348 FINISHED
Object primarily Vitis aestivalis heritage LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: primarily Vitis aestivalis heritage | Statement: [Norton, grapeSpeciesBackground, primarily Vitis aestivalis heritage]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: grapeSpeciesBackground
Context triple: [Norton, grapeSpeciesBackground, primarily Vitis aestivalis heritage]
  • A. grapeSource
    Indicates that one entity is the origin or provider of grapes used by another entity.
  • B. viticultureHistory
    Indicates the historical development, practices, and events related to grape cultivation and winemaking over time.
  • C. grapeConfusionNote
    Indicates a note documenting confusion, ambiguity, or uncertainty specifically related to grapes or grape-related information.
  • D. grapeColorDistribution
    Indicates how colors are proportionally or categorically distributed among a set of grapes.
  • E. traditionalGrapeVariety
    Indicates that a grape variety is traditionally or historically used in a specific region, wine style, or cultural winemaking practice.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68857ffc08190857dc62cd5253777 completed March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6dbeef57881909245c8a5374a8111 completed March 27, 2026, 7:35 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d7c4a18881908d267137daed828b completed March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6dbbc00fc8190a18221524b774021 completed March 27, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:33 p.m.