Triple
T6724451
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Native American sovereignty |
E153476
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicallyArticulatedIn |
P73367
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Worcester v. Georgia (1832) |
E38721
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Worcester v. Georgia (1832) | Statement: [Native American sovereignty, historicallyArticulatedIn, Worcester v. Georgia (1832)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Worcester v. Georgia (1832) Context triple: [Native American sovereignty, historicallyArticulatedIn, Worcester v. Georgia (1832)]
-
A.
Worcester v. Georgia
chosen
Worcester v. Georgia was an 1832 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that states had no authority to impose laws on Native American tribal lands, affirming tribal sovereignty in the face of federal Indian Removal policies.
-
B.
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was an 1831 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Cherokee Nation was a "domestic dependent nation" lacking standing to sue as a foreign nation, a ruling that shaped federal Indian law and the context of Indian Removal.
-
C.
Chisholm v. Georgia
Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
-
D.
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
-
E.
Fletcher v. Peck
Fletcher v. Peck was an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that for the first time struck down a state law as unconstitutional, helping define the scope of the Contract Clause and judicial review over state legislation.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6880afb988190ad88011b48ecfcba |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d7c94bac8190ae4b236d1b04bec9 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c70afcbe308190909fe8f34ca8e5e2 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:55 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:08 p.m.