Triple

T6673179
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Paula Corbin Jones E151782 entity
Predicate legalAction P7077 FINISHED
Object Clinton v. Jones E15619 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Clinton v. Jones | Statement: [Paula Corbin Jones, legalAction, Clinton v. Jones]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Clinton v. Jones
Context triple: [Paula Corbin Jones, legalAction, Clinton v. Jones]
  • A. Clinton v. Jones chosen
    Clinton v. Jones is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a sitting president is not immune from civil litigation for unofficial acts committed before taking office.
  • B. Bush v. Gore
    Bush v. Gore is the landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that effectively resolved the disputed presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore by halting the Florida recount.
  • C. Bush v. Vera
    Bush v. Vera is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied and extended the racial gerrymandering principles from Shaw v. Reno to invalidate certain Texas congressional districts drawn predominantly on the basis of race.
  • D. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
    Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
  • E. Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court limited judicial intrusion into the executive branch’s internal deliberations, particularly regarding Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy task force records.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c687f830bc81909eb8b04dbb8450b1 completed March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6b0cb78b08190923685712cbba5d8 completed March 27, 2026, 4:31 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c70aeef0d881909da055735646dbaf completed March 27, 2026, 10:55 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:03 p.m.