Triple

T651307
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Judeo-Persian E11349 entity
Predicate hasWrittenTradition P11605 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Judeo-Persian, hasWrittenTradition, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasWrittenTradition
Context triple: [Judeo-Persian, hasWrittenTradition, yes]
  • A. hasWritingTraditionSince
    Indicates that a writing tradition has been present or established for an entity starting from a specified point in time.
  • B. literaryTradition
    Indicates a relationship where a work, practice, or expression belongs to, arises from, or participates in a particular established body of literary customs, styles, or conventions.
  • C. writingTradition chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with, follows, or belongs to a particular system or style of written expression or script usage.
  • D. hasHistoricalWritingInfluenceFrom
    Indicates that one entity’s historical writing style, content, or traditions are influenced by those of another entity.
  • E. hasWrittenForm
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific written or textual representation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493266a2881909daf4c40f719dee8 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49f33b6d881908b6662b73d6fe833 completed March 1, 2026, 8:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49d0eade081909c47e85ed55f808d completed March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.