Triple
T6423192
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 |
E127993
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToOtherLaw |
P61922
|
FINISHED |
| Object | supplements the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: supplements the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 | Statement: [Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, relationshipToOtherLaw, supplements the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToOtherLaw Context triple: [Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, relationshipToOtherLaw, supplements the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890]
-
A.
relatedLegalConcept
chosen
Indicates that one legal concept is connected or associated with another through a relevant legal relationship or context.
-
B.
relatedLegalSystem
Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
-
C.
relatedCase
Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
-
D.
laterRelationWith
Indicates that one entity stands in a temporal relationship to another such that it occurs or exists at a later time than the other.
-
E.
relatedCaseArea
Indicates that one case is associated with, pertains to, or falls within the subject matter or domain of another case area.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00838de888190af2eec0b80495efa |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0690576c48190b5db5464eacc9de3 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 10:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c060f780b08190aa650b4d1fc51f21 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:43 p.m.