Triple
T6262812
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pavanputra |
E140341
|
entity |
| Predicate | meaningLiteral |
P3918
|
FINISHED |
| Object | son of the wind |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: son of the wind | Statement: [Pavanputra, meaningLiteral, son of the wind]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: meaningLiteral Context triple: [Pavanputra, meaningLiteral, son of the wind]
-
A.
hasLiteralMeaning
chosen
Indicates that one entity expresses the direct, explicit meaning or sense of another entity (such as a word, phrase, or symbol).
-
B.
logicalMeaning
Indicates that one entity expresses, encodes, or conveys the logical content, implication, or formal meaning of another.
-
C.
meaningComponent
Indicates that one entity represents a semantic or conceptual component contributing to the overall meaning of another entity.
-
D.
stringMeaning
Indicates that one entity represents the semantic content or interpretation of a given string associated with another entity.
-
E.
possibleMeaning
Indicates that something may plausibly represent, signify, or be interpreted as a particular meaning or sense.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008c95c5c819084bd3dd56133d84d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c06387fec0819095b47a37b9402aa9 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c05605566c81908e197f5accd072d2 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:25 p.m.