Triple

T5851279
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Roth v. United States E130035 entity
Predicate subsequentCase P67498 FINISHED
Object Memoirs v. Massachusetts E468427 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Memoirs v. Massachusetts | Statement: [Roth v. United States, subsequentCase, Memoirs v. Massachusetts]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Memoirs v. Massachusetts
Context triple: [Roth v. United States, subsequentCase, Memoirs v. Massachusetts]
  • A. Memoirs v. Massachusetts chosen
    Memoirs v. Massachusetts is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the legal test for obscenity under the First Amendment, further protecting controversial literary works from censorship.
  • B. Prince v. Massachusetts
    Prince v. Massachusetts is a 1944 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state authority to regulate child labor and limit children's religiously motivated activities in public for their protection.
  • C. McCullen v. Coakley
    McCullen v. Coakley is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Massachusetts’ abortion-clinic buffer zone law as violating the First Amendment’s free speech protections.
  • D. Cantwell v. Connecticut
    Cantwell v. Connecticut is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that first applied the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to the states, striking down a state law that improperly restricted religious proselytizing.
  • E. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
    First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded First Amendment protections by recognizing corporations’ rights to spend money to influence ballot initiatives.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0084de39081909eb34e6bed74215a completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c049fbc57481908299d1955692c76b completed March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c0a1b3c7d08190bada8ae35e7fa8eb completed March 23, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:55 p.m.