Triple

T5851270
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Roth v. United States E130035 entity
Predicate overruledPrecedent P2251 FINISHED
Object United States v. One Book Called Ulysses (to the extent inconsistent with new standard) E105634 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. One Book Called Ulysses (to the extent inconsistent with new standard) | Statement: [Roth v. United States, overruledPrecedent, United States v. One Book Called Ulysses (to the extent inconsistent with new standard)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States v. One Book Called Ulysses (to the extent inconsistent with new standard)
Context triple: [Roth v. United States, overruledPrecedent, United States v. One Book Called Ulysses (to the extent inconsistent with new standard)]
  • A. United States v. One Book Called Ulysses chosen
    United States v. One Book Called Ulysses is a landmark 1933 U.S. federal court decision that lifted the ban on James Joyce’s novel "Ulysses" and significantly redefined American obscenity law in favor of literary freedom.
  • B. Printz v. United States
    Printz v. United States is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited federal power by holding that Congress cannot compel state or local officials to implement federal regulatory programs.
  • C. Nebbia v. New York
    Nebbia v. New York is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state regulation of milk prices and marked a major retreat from the Lochner-era limits on economic regulation under the Due Process Clause.
  • D. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law
    A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law is a book in which Justice Antonin Scalia articulates and defends his textualist approach to statutory and constitutional interpretation in the American legal system.
  • E. New York v. Quarles
    New York v. Quarles is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created the "public safety" exception to the Miranda warning requirement, allowing certain unwarned statements to be admitted when needed to protect public safety.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0084de39081909eb34e6bed74215a completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c035176c8c81909e24d263e4feb664 completed March 22, 2026, 6:29 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c0a1b3c7d08190bada8ae35e7fa8eb completed March 23, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:55 p.m.