Triple

T5779858
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article 324 of the Constitution of India E127528 entity
Predicate citedIn P771 FINISHED
Object T. N. Seshan v. Union of India E553646 NE FINISHED

Named-entity recognition

Before disambiguation, gpt-5-mini classified whether the object phrase is a named entity — the step behind the object's NE type shown above.

Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: T. N. Seshan v. Union of India | Statement: [Article 324 of the Constitution of India, citedIn, T. N. Seshan v. Union of India]

Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)

The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: T. N. Seshan v. Union of India
Context triple: [Article 324 of the Constitution of India, citedIn, T. N. Seshan v. Union of India]
  • A. Waman Rao v. Union of India
    Waman Rao v. Union of India is a landmark 1981 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed and clarified the basic structure doctrine by upholding its applicability to constitutional amendments made after the Kesavananda Bharati decision.
  • B. L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India
    L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed judicial review as part of the Constitution’s basic structure and held that decisions of tribunals are subject to scrutiny by High Courts under Articles 226 and 227.
  • C. S. S. Dhanoa v. Union of India chosen
    S. S. Dhanoa v. Union of India is a Supreme Court of India judgment that examined the constitutional status, powers, and independence of the Election Commission and its officers in the context of electoral administration.
  • D. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
    Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India is a landmark 1980 judgment of the Supreme Court of India that reaffirmed and strengthened the basic structure doctrine by limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
  • E. S. R. Bommai v. Union of India
    S. R. Bommai v. Union of India is a landmark 1994 Supreme Court of India judgment that curtailed the arbitrary use of President’s Rule and strengthened federalism by applying the basic structure doctrine to center-state relations.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

Stage Batch ID Job type Status
creating batch_69c008361fa88190aefa4dc41b051e7f elicitation completed
NER batch_69c029e26ff88190b7f8eb03bcd30dc6 ner completed
NED1 batch_69c0bfa9d9348190b8916accca9374f2 ned_source_triple completed
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:50 p.m.