Triple

T5545077
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nixon v. Fitzgerald E145385 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Fitzgerald v. Hampton
Fitzgerald v. Hampton is a U.S. federal court case involving civil service employment and administrative law issues that is related to the later Supreme Court decision in Nixon v. Fitzgerald.
E529751 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fitzgerald v. Hampton | Statement: [Nixon v. Fitzgerald, relatedTo, Fitzgerald v. Hampton]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fitzgerald v. Hampton
Context triple: [Nixon v. Fitzgerald, relatedTo, Fitzgerald v. Hampton]
  • A. Argersinger v. Hamlin
    Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
  • B. Ray v. Blair
    Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
  • C. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • D. Ingraham v. Wright
    Ingraham v. Wright is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment does not apply to corporal punishment in public schools and that due process does not require a prior hearing before such discipline is imposed.
  • E. Henry v. Hodges
    Henry v. Hodges is a federal court case challenging state bans on same-sex marriage, decided alongside other landmark marriage equality cases prior to Obergefell v. Hodges.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Fitzgerald v. Hampton
Triple: [Nixon v. Fitzgerald, relatedTo, Fitzgerald v. Hampton]
Generated description
Fitzgerald v. Hampton is a U.S. federal court case involving civil service employment and administrative law issues that is related to the later Supreme Court decision in Nixon v. Fitzgerald.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fitzgerald v. Hampton
Target entity description: Fitzgerald v. Hampton is a U.S. federal court case involving civil service employment and administrative law issues that is related to the later Supreme Court decision in Nixon v. Fitzgerald.
  • A. Argersinger v. Hamlin
    Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
  • B. Ray v. Blair
    Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
  • C. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • D. Ingraham v. Wright
    Ingraham v. Wright is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment does not apply to corporal punishment in public schools and that due process does not require a prior hearing before such discipline is imposed.
  • E. Henry v. Hodges
    Henry v. Hodges is a federal court case challenging state bans on same-sex marriage, decided alongside other landmark marriage equality cases prior to Obergefell v. Hodges.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008fb879c81909f5bfa56fadc1d46 completed March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c01fcc75448190a4c47ded65591345 completed March 22, 2026, 4:58 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c02826d84c8190a745e891ac2cccb8 completed March 22, 2026, 5:34 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69c03847b3348190be97b7c5795df368 completed March 22, 2026, 6:43 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69c038e148a0819080a306307e60d437 completed March 22, 2026, 6:45 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:35 p.m.