Triple

T5479086
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Encapsulating Security Payload E123426 entity
Predicate canEncrypt P5656 FINISHED
Object upper-layer protocols LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: upper-layer protocols | Statement: [Encapsulating Security Payload, canEncrypt, upper-layer protocols]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canEncrypt
Context triple: [Encapsulating Security Payload, canEncrypt, upper-layer protocols]
  • A. requiresEncryption
    Indicates that one entity must use encryption when communicating with, storing data for, or otherwise interacting with another entity.
  • B. usesEncryptionAlgorithm chosen
    Indicates that one entity applies or relies on a specific encryption algorithm to protect data or communications.
  • C. hasCrypt
    Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a crypt belonging to or located within it.
  • D. canCrackEncryption
    Indicates that an entity has the capability to break or bypass the encryption protecting another entity’s data or communications.
  • E. canDecryptTraffic
    Indicates that one entity has the capability to decrypt or otherwise access the contents of network traffic associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd4648883481909e9775d43300c5fa completed March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd9247a16c8190ac5a02534da48853 completed March 20, 2026, 6:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd91a58c448190904964a439045e05 completed March 20, 2026, 6:27 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 2:09 p.m.