Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding revocation of tax-exempt status over racial policies | Statement: [Bob Jones University, Bob Jones University v. United States, 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding revocation of tax-exempt status over racial policies]

Target entity: 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding revocation of tax-exempt status over racial policies
Context triple: [Bob Jones University, Bob Jones University v. United States, 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding revocation of tax-exempt status over racial policies]

• A. Employment Division v. Smith
  Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
• B. Board of Education v. Pico
  Board of Education v. Pico is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case in which a divided Court held that public school boards may not remove books from school libraries simply because they dislike the ideas contained in them, recognizing students’ limited First Amendment right to receive information.
• C. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
  Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the use of busing and broad equitable powers by federal courts to achieve racial desegregation in public schools.
• D. Gratz v. Bollinger
  Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
• E. Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden
  The Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden was a 1980 ruling that required proof of discriminatory intent in voting rights cases, prompting Congress to amend the Voting Rights Act in 1982 to restore a results-based standard.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding revocation of tax-exempt status over racial policies
Triple: [Bob Jones University, Bob Jones University v. United States, 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding revocation of tax-exempt status over racial policies]

Bob Jones University v. United States is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed the government’s authority to deny tax-exempt status to religious schools whose policies violate fundamental public policy against racial discrimination.

Target entity: 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding revocation of tax-exempt status over racial policies
Target entity description: Bob Jones University v. United States is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed the government’s authority to deny tax-exempt status to religious schools whose policies violate fundamental public policy against racial discrimination.

• A. Employment Division v. Smith
  Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
• B. Board of Education v. Pico
  Board of Education v. Pico is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case in which a divided Court held that public school boards may not remove books from school libraries simply because they dislike the ideas contained in them, recognizing students’ limited First Amendment right to receive information.
• C. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
  Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the use of busing and broad equitable powers by federal courts to achieve racial desegregation in public schools.
• D. Gratz v. Bollinger
  Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
• E. Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden
  The Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden was a 1980 ruling that required proof of discriminatory intent in voting rights cases, prompting Congress to amend the Voting Rights Act in 1982 to restore a results-based standard.
• F. None of above. chosen

Target predicate: Bob Jones University v. United States
Context triple: [Bob Jones University, Bob Jones University v. United States, 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding revocation of tax-exempt status over racial policies]

• A. religiousFreedomCaseInvolvement
  Indicates involvement in a legal or public case concerning issues of religious freedom or religious rights.
• B. opposedPartyInSherbert v. Verner
  Indicates that the referenced party is the opposing side to the main litigant in the Sherbert v. Verner legal case.
• C. declaredUnconstitutionalInCase
  Indicates that a law, policy, or action was ruled unconstitutional in a specific legal case.
• D. notableSupremeCourtCase chosen
  Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
• E. judgmentInvolves
  Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
• F. None of above.