Triple

T4992308
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Stridon E112159 entity
Predicate languageInHistoricalContext P30358 FINISHED
Object Latin LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Latin | Statement: [Stridon, languageInHistoricalContext, Latin]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageInHistoricalContext
Context triple: [Stridon, languageInHistoricalContext, Latin]
  • A. historicalLanguage
    Indicates that one language is a historical or earlier form/ancestor of another language.
  • B. languageOfHistoricalRecord chosen
    Indicates the language in which a given historical record is written or recorded.
  • C. historicalLanguageOfEnvironment
    Indicates that a language was historically used or prevalent in a given environment or setting, even if it is not the current primary language there.
  • D. historicalLanguageInfluenceOn
    Indicates that one language has had a shaping or contributory effect on the development, vocabulary, structure, or usage of another language over time.
  • E. historicalLanguageCenter
    Indicates that a location has served as a significant hub or focal point for the development, use, or study of a particular language in the past.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd441be7bc8190b530362d427b97d2 completed March 20, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd74249a8c8190952680aee06a9286 completed March 20, 2026, 4:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69bd71492dec8190af4c27a3043b35cc completed March 20, 2026, 4:09 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:34 p.m.