Triple
T4795664
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Richard Loving |
E106704
|
entity |
| Predicate | supremeCourtCaseResult |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | anti-miscegenation laws declared unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: anti-miscegenation laws declared unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment | Statement: [Richard Loving, supremeCourtCaseResult, anti-miscegenation laws declared unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supremeCourtCaseResult Context triple: [Richard Loving, supremeCourtCaseResult, anti-miscegenation laws declared unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment]
-
A.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
B.
notableSupremeCourtCase
Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
-
C.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
D.
succeededInSupremeCourtSeatBy
Indicates that one individual directly followed another in occupying the same seat on the Supreme Court.
-
E.
judgmentInvolves
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43f591c881909e5a532388b0f3f3 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd6b40c29c8190adab3503f8ba0145 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd622f88188190a51d52ccfad3d2dd |
completed | March 20, 2026, 3:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:22 p.m.