Triple

T4573084
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kathryn A. Piper E123080 entity
Predicate partyIn P1790 FINISHED
Object Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper E15222 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper | Statement: [Kathryn A. Piper, partyIn, Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper
Context triple: [Kathryn A. Piper, partyIn, Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper]
  • A. Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper chosen
    Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state residency requirement for bar admission as unconstitutional under the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
  • B. Alden v. Maine
    Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
  • C. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
    Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "fighting words" doctrine, holding that certain personally abusive epithets are not protected by the First Amendment.
  • D. Argersinger v. Hamlin
    Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
  • E. Palko v. Connecticut
    Palko v. Connecticut is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped define the doctrine of selective incorporation by holding that only certain fundamental rights in the Bill of Rights apply to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd46466c7081909d07f36be2d08804 completed March 20, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd58c711408190a2b096daf57e6eac completed March 20, 2026, 2:25 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69bdd3d709308190aeb6a71a9dabdd3c completed March 20, 2026, 11:10 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:10 p.m.