Triple
T4556567
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | First Protectorate Parliament |
E120493
|
entity |
| Predicate | debated |
P51889
|
FINISHED |
| Object | military influence in government |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: military influence in government | Statement: [First Protectorate Parliament, debated, military influence in government]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: debated Context triple: [First Protectorate Parliament, debated, military influence in government]
-
A.
disputed
Indicates that there is active disagreement or contestation over the validity, ownership, interpretation, or status of the relationship or claim between the entities.
-
B.
discussed
chosen
Indicates that one entity talked about, examined, or debated a topic, issue, or other entity with someone else.
-
C.
debatedAt
Indicates that a debate or formal discussion involving the subject took place at the specified location or event.
-
D.
partOfDebate
Indicates that one entity is a component, segment, or participant within a larger debate or argumentative exchange.
-
E.
hasDebatedMeaning
Indicates that the meaning or interpretation of something is contested, disputed, or subject to ongoing debate.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4636f1648190a701445c2fcd9c17 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd5814f56c8190a65f61f6148b7e5a |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5223423c81908317351b58cff5f5 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:09 p.m.