Triple
T4556566
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | First Protectorate Parliament |
E120493
|
entity |
| Predicate | religiousPolicyDebatesOn |
P53157
|
FINISHED |
| Object | religious toleration |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: religious toleration | Statement: [First Protectorate Parliament, religiousPolicyDebatesOn, religious toleration]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: religiousPolicyDebatesOn Context triple: [First Protectorate Parliament, religiousPolicyDebatesOn, religious toleration]
-
A.
religionPolicy
Indicates the stance, rules, or approach an entity adopts toward religious beliefs, practices, or institutions.
-
B.
dominantReligionPolicy
Indicates the policy or stance an authority adopts toward the religion that holds dominant or majority status within a given context.
-
C.
religiousControversy
chosen
Indicates a relationship in which entities are involved in a dispute, conflict, or debate specifically concerning religious beliefs, practices, or institutions.
-
D.
religiousTopicAddressed
Indicates that a subject deals with, discusses, or focuses on a religious theme, issue, or question.
-
E.
religiousFreedomCaseInvolvement
Indicates involvement in a legal or public case concerning issues of religious freedom or religious rights.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd4636f1648190a701445c2fcd9c17 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd5814f56c8190a65f61f6148b7e5a |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5223423c81908317351b58cff5f5 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:09 p.m.