Triple
T4493139
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gödel's ontological proof |
E100625
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageOfOriginalNotes |
P5459
|
FINISHED |
| Object | German |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: German | Statement: [Gödel's ontological proof, languageOfOriginalNotes, German]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageOfOriginalNotes Context triple: [Gödel's ontological proof, languageOfOriginalNotes, German]
-
A.
primaryLanguageOnNotes
Indicates the main language used in the written notes associated with an entity or resource.
-
B.
originalTextLanguage
chosen
Indicates the language in which a text was originally written or created before any translation or adaptation.
-
C.
languageOfSources
Indicates that the specified language is the language in which the referenced sources or source materials are expressed.
-
D.
languageOfRecords
Indicates the language in which the records are written or maintained.
-
E.
languageOfWritings
Indicates that a specified language is the one in which certain writings or written works are composed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69bd43cdf15081909a4fa2585ff63b3e |
completed | March 20, 2026, 12:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69bd5570ba0881908f5fb4f8d0730e64 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69bd5213e3d0819094b026989e686f01 |
completed | March 20, 2026, 1:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 20, 2026, 12:59 p.m.