Triple

T443823
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sinhala E10172 entity
Predicate hasTenseSystem P5214 FINISHED
Object past–non-past distinction LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: past–non-past distinction | Statement: [Sinhala, hasTenseSystem, past–non-past distinction]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTenseSystem
Context triple: [Sinhala, hasTenseSystem, past–non-past distinction]
  • A. hasTenseAspectSystem chosen
    Indicates that a language or clause employs a particular system for expressing tense and aspect distinctions.
  • B. hasTense
    Indicates that an action, event, or state is associated with a specific grammatical tense (such as past, present, or future).
  • C. hasPastTenseEnding
    Indicates that a verb form ends with a morphological marker typically used to express past tense.
  • D. hasNounClassSystem
    Indicates that an entity possesses a grammatical system in which nouns are categorized into distinct classes that affect their agreement with other elements in the language.
  • E. hasFutureTenseEnding
    Indicates that a verb or expression carries a morphological ending marking future tense.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e8465ef481909655c681b01e2986 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ef43e8f88190a5d368add11a38c0 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2edde2b9c8190bd20b582eb4c5065 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:30 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m.