Triple

T4229610
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Washington v. Davis E94545 entity
Predicate influenced P9 FINISHED
Object Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney E391917 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney | Statement: [Washington v. Davis, influenced, Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney
Context triple: [Washington v. Davis, influenced, Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney]
  • A. Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney chosen
    Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney is a 1979 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the standard for proving unconstitutional sex discrimination by requiring a showing of discriminatory intent rather than merely discriminatory impact.
  • B. Cooley v. Board of Wardens
    Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
  • C. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
    Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
  • D. Frontiero v. Richardson
    Frontiero v. Richardson is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that advanced gender equality by striking down federal benefit rules that discriminated against female military service members.
  • E. Employment Division v. Smith
    Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3453700a08190ae88792e3dc63207 completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b34e61ccc081909b880baf1d6a0f24 completed March 12, 2026, 11:38 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b5964cd0088190a97ca5278046ba7b completed March 14, 2026, 5:09 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:05 p.m.