Triple

T4165613
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Formula of Universal Law E84437 entity
Predicate exampleApplication P54441 FINISHED
Object duty not to make false promises LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: duty not to make false promises | Statement: [Formula of Universal Law, exampleApplication, duty not to make false promises]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exampleApplication
Context triple: [Formula of Universal Law, exampleApplication, duty not to make false promises]
  • A. definesApplication
    Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the purpose, scope, or behavior of an application associated with another entity.
  • B. hasApp
    Indicates that an entity possesses, provides, or is associated with a particular application.
  • C. typeOfApplication
    Indicates the specific category or kind of application involved in the relationship or action.
  • D. notableApplicationDevelopedOn
    Indicates that a notable software application was created or built to run on a particular platform, system, or technology.
  • E. applicationLocation
    Indicates the place or environment where an application is deployed, used, or made available.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed932cab48190b80ffe35f7029ae1 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69af02ac8e788190a8f3563a2903bbad completed March 9, 2026, 5:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69af018fb0948190a9701b2e8e5d9bac completed March 9, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69af01ee94ec8190aa6dde54d4571c04 completed March 9, 2026, 5:22 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:44 p.m.