Triple
T405981
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Secretary of State for the Southern Department |
E9384
|
entity |
| Predicate | reorganizedIn |
P10997
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1782 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1782 | Statement: [Secretary of State for the Southern Department, reorganizedIn, 1782]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reorganizedIn Context triple: [Secretary of State for the Southern Department, reorganizedIn, 1782]
-
A.
reorganizedAs
Indicates that an existing entity has been restructured or reconfigured into a new organizational form or arrangement.
-
B.
reorganized
Indicates that an entity has changed the structure, order, or arrangement of another entity or set of entities from a previous configuration.
-
C.
isPartOfReorganization
Indicates that an entity is involved in, or belongs to, a structural or organizational reconfiguration process.
-
D.
organizedAs
Indicates how elements are structured, arranged, or grouped according to a particular organizing principle or scheme.
-
E.
typeOfReorganization
Indicates the specific kind or category of organizational restructuring that is being or has been carried out.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e8004cb88190b92ed1add6abf41a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ecbc00508190bbb602179273f29c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e971a3a481909e6b075f25dd234a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ea4545608190898436c72e10f39d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.