Triple
T4025148
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP |
E91373
|
entity |
| Predicate | holding |
P2237
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
The House committees had to satisfy a more demanding standard to enforce subpoenas for the President’s personal financial records.
Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that set limits on Congress’s ability to subpoena a sitting president’s personal financial records by requiring heightened scrutiny of such requests.
|
E406783
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The House committees had to satisfy a more demanding standard to enforce subpoenas for the President’s personal financial records. | Statement: [Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP, holding, The House committees had to satisfy a more demanding standard to enforce subpoenas for the President’s personal financial records.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The House committees had to satisfy a more demanding standard to enforce subpoenas for the President’s personal financial records. Context triple: [Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP, holding, The House committees had to satisfy a more demanding standard to enforce subpoenas for the President’s personal financial records.]
-
A.
Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities
The Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities was a special U.S. Senate committee that investigated the Watergate scandal and related abuses of power during President Richard Nixon’s 1972 re-election campaign.
-
B.
Public Accounts Committee
The Public Accounts Committee is a legislative oversight body in Dominica responsible for examining government expenditures and ensuring public funds are used lawfully and efficiently.
-
C.
Public Accounts Committee
The Public Accounts Committee is a key parliamentary body in Uganda responsible for scrutinizing government expenditures and ensuring accountability in the use of public funds.
-
D.
Public Accounts Committee
The Public Accounts Committee is a key oversight body in the Nigerian legislature responsible for examining government expenditures and ensuring public funds are used lawfully and efficiently.
-
E.
Public Accounts Committee
The Public Accounts Committee is a scrutiny body that examines how public funds are spent and ensures financial accountability within Jersey’s government.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: The House committees had to satisfy a more demanding standard to enforce subpoenas for the President’s personal financial records. Triple: [Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP, holding, The House committees had to satisfy a more demanding standard to enforce subpoenas for the President’s personal financial records.]
Generated description
Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that set limits on Congress’s ability to subpoena a sitting president’s personal financial records by requiring heightened scrutiny of such requests.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The House committees had to satisfy a more demanding standard to enforce subpoenas for the President’s personal financial records. Target entity description: Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that set limits on Congress’s ability to subpoena a sitting president’s personal financial records by requiring heightened scrutiny of such requests.
-
A.
Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities
The Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities was a special U.S. Senate committee that investigated the Watergate scandal and related abuses of power during President Richard Nixon’s 1972 re-election campaign.
-
B.
Public Accounts Committee
The Public Accounts Committee is a key oversight body in the Nigerian legislature responsible for examining government expenditures and ensuring public funds are used lawfully and efficiently.
-
C.
Public Accounts Committee
The Public Accounts Committee is a legislative oversight body in Dominica responsible for examining government expenditures and ensuring public funds are used lawfully and efficiently.
-
D.
Public Accounts Committee
The Public Accounts Committee is a key parliamentary body in Uganda responsible for scrutinizing government expenditures and ensuring accountability in the use of public funds.
-
E.
Public Accounts Committee
The Public Accounts Committee is a key legislative body that scrutinizes government expenditures to ensure they are lawful, efficient, and in line with the budget approved by the legislature.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed9618b04819081750d979d2af098 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aefacfb23081909a46878adb90ea6c |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:52 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b54c84ce9081909ecf3aeee95cb2bf |
completed | March 14, 2026, 11:54 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69b54d076f708190a0d86120d78e8d77 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 11:56 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69b54d5fa6c4819089d190c4cfdb8cd0 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 11:58 a.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:35 p.m.