Triple

T4021352
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Google Scholar E91284 entity
Predicate hasRankingAlgorithm P53494 FINISHED
Object relevance-based ranking LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: relevance-based ranking | Statement: [Google Scholar, hasRankingAlgorithm, relevance-based ranking]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRankingAlgorithm
Context triple: [Google Scholar, hasRankingAlgorithm, relevance-based ranking]
  • A. hasRankingUnit
    Indicates that one entity is associated with a specific unit or scale used to express its ranking or ordered position.
  • B. hasRankingCategory
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular ranking category or tier within an ordered classification system.
  • C. selectionRankingEndPoint
    Indicates the position or boundary in an ordered list at which a selection or ranking process concludes.
  • D. hasRankOrder
    Indicates that one entity is ordered or positioned relative to others according to a specific ranking or sequence.
  • E. rankedAs
    Indicates that one entity is assigned a specific position or level in an ordered ranking relative to others.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed9618b04819081750d979d2af098 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aefacb4c208190b8dd595a534850b2 completed March 9, 2026, 4:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aef8fc78ec819092d4dab88d85a141 completed March 9, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69aefa815f2c8190818c9ffd9d1bf478 completed March 9, 2026, 4:51 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:35 p.m.