Triple
T38641204
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Collie eye anomaly |
E938597
|
entity |
| Predicate | screeningRecommendedFor |
P191648
|
FINISHED |
| Object | breeding dogs in at-risk breeds |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: breeding dogs in at-risk breeds | Statement: [Collie eye anomaly, screeningRecommendedFor, breeding dogs in at-risk breeds]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: screeningRecommendedFor Context triple: [Collie eye anomaly, screeningRecommendedFor, breeding dogs in at-risk breeds]
-
A.
admissionRecommendedFor
Indicates that one party has suggested or endorsed that another party be granted admission to a program, institution, or event.
-
B.
ratedFor
Indicates that an entity has been evaluated and assigned a suitability or quality level for a particular purpose, context, or audience.
-
C.
screenedWith
Indicates that one entity is examined, tested, or evaluated using another entity as the screening method, tool, or criterion.
-
D.
ageRatingContext
Indicates the contextual basis or circumstances (such as region, system, or criteria) under which an age rating is assigned or interpreted.
-
E.
screeningType
Indicates the specific method or category of screening applied in a screening process or evaluation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed948ec81908ce7811608a8f359 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fce545fec881909247a3af821d21ae |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fce12eaeec81908cf81346b2cef6e0 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:59 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fce54532948190a5cfacfe18e09322 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.