Triple
T38437122
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zivotofsky v. Clinton |
E903976
|
entity |
| Predicate | dissentingBy |
P4522
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Statement: [Zivotofsky v. Clinton, dissentingBy, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dissentingBy Context triple: [Zivotofsky v. Clinton, dissentingBy, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg]
-
A.
dissentingJustice
chosen
Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
-
B.
dissentingVoteBy
Indicates that a particular vote was cast in opposition to the majority or prevailing decision by a specific entity.
-
C.
hasDissentingJustice
Indicates that within a judicial decision or ruling, there exists at least one justice who formally disagrees with the majority opinion.
-
D.
dissentingOpinionConcern
Indicates that one party holds a differing or opposing view and expresses concern or disagreement regarding another party’s position, decision, or statement.
-
E.
dissentReason
Indicates the reason or justification given for expressing disagreement or opposition to something.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e6a2024819081aa04f4932f89d2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcce7afcd08190906cc3801152656a |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcccf140ec8190862d53388a5f40d7 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.