Triple
T38418676
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission |
E903167
|
entity |
| Predicate | subsequentRedistrictingCycle |
P129065
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2011–2012 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2011–2012 | Statement: [Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, subsequentRedistrictingCycle, 2011–2012]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subsequentRedistrictingCycle Context triple: [Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, subsequentRedistrictingCycle, 2011–2012]
-
A.
subsequentRedistrictingYear
chosen
Indicates that one redistricting year occurs immediately after another in temporal sequence.
-
B.
hasRedistrictingCycle
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific schedule or sequence of redistricting events, such as when and how its electoral districts are periodically redrawn.
-
C.
nextRedistrictingWillFollow
Indicates that a future redistricting process will be conducted in accordance with a specified plan, rule, or procedure.
-
D.
lastRedistrictingBasedOn
Indicates the redistricting event or plan that most recently served as the basis for the current district boundaries.
-
E.
notableRedistrictingEvent
Indicates that a redistricting action or change to electoral boundaries is significant or noteworthy in its impact, controversy, or historical importance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e67e4fc8190a7d08dfe9a8af998 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcd1499e2c81909bafd84dc4810f45 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcccf024ec819086383ffbb6cfc036 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.