Triple

T38079020
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Caturmahārāja E950799 entity
Predicate equivalentTermInJapanese P57913 FINISHED
Object Shitennō NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Shitennō | Statement: [Caturmahārāja, equivalentTermInJapanese, Shitennō]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: equivalentTermInJapanese
Context triple: [Caturmahārāja, equivalentTermInJapanese, Shitennō]
  • A. equivalentTitleInJapanese chosen
    Indicates that one entity has a corresponding or matching title in Japanese that is equivalent in meaning or usage to the other entity’s title.
  • B. equivalentInJapaneseKanji
    Indicates that one entity has the same meaning or value as another entity when written in Japanese Kanji.
  • C. JapaneseTermComponent
    Indicates that one element functions as a component or part of a Japanese term (such as a word, phrase, or expression).
  • D. hasMeaningInJapanese
    Indicates that something (such as a word, phrase, or symbol) possesses a specific meaning when interpreted in the Japanese language.
  • E. equivalentIn
    Indicates that two entities are considered logically or functionally the same in meaning, status, or effect within a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76f02a6c48190a94f3c0b3ee90cf2 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcc42cbac48190b8d3e4c9ce140838 completed May 7, 2026, 4:56 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcb0fc69c88190800453eb57a7e62c completed May 7, 2026, 3:34 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:21 p.m.