Triple

T37635211
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mexico 68 logo E936467 entity
Predicate extendedColorPalette P17891 FINISHED
Object vibrant, saturated colors in applications LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: vibrant, saturated colors in applications | Statement: [Mexico 68 logo, extendedColorPalette, vibrant, saturated colors in applications]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: extendedColorPalette
Context triple: [Mexico 68 logo, extendedColorPalette, vibrant, saturated colors in applications]
  • A. laterColorOption
    Indicates that one color option occurs or becomes available after another in a sequence or ordering.
  • B. laterColorVariant
    Indicates that one entity is a color variant that appeared or was introduced after the other entity in time.
  • C. shadeColor
    Indicates that one entity has a specific shade or variation of color associated with it.
  • D. colorUse
    Indicates that one entity uses, applies, or is associated with a particular color in its appearance, design, or representation.
  • E. primaryColorPalette chosen
    Indicates the set of main or dominant colors associated with an entity, typically used as its core color scheme.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ed31d8881908405da6c6d2f0463 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbaa1321b48190af92a3e7ec24ec5b completed May 6, 2026, 8:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fba8860f98819080b7bab05837b974 completed May 6, 2026, 8:45 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.