Triple

T37159312
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sterling Cooper E920601 entity
Predicate hasAccountExecutive P146552 FINISHED
Object Pete Campbell NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pete Campbell | Statement: [Sterling Cooper, hasAccountExecutive, Pete Campbell]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAccountExecutive
Context triple: [Sterling Cooper, hasAccountExecutive, Pete Campbell]
  • A. hasExecutivePartner
    Indicates that an entity has a business partner with executive-level authority or status within the partnership.
  • B. hasBusinessAdministrator
    Indicates that an entity is associated with another entity that serves as its business administrator, responsible for managing its business-related operations or affairs.
  • C. headOfAccount chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary responsible authority or leader for a specified account.
  • D. hasMarketingRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a position or responsibility related to marketing activities within an organization.
  • E. containsAccountOf
    Indicates that one entity includes, records, or holds information about another entity’s account.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ea0429081908c711b55599eac3c completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd2839880c819099a7a89783f2270e completed May 8, 2026, 12:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd23dc5da48190ae8ba08947d34956 completed May 7, 2026, 11:44 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.