Triple

T3705038
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gabrielino-Fernandeño E80870 entity
Predicate hasPlaceNameLegacyIn P17611 FINISHED
Object Los Angeles area toponyms LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Los Angeles area toponyms | Statement: [Gabrielino-Fernandeño, hasPlaceNameLegacyIn, Los Angeles area toponyms]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPlaceNameLegacyIn
Context triple: [Gabrielino-Fernandeño, hasPlaceNameLegacyIn, Los Angeles area toponyms]
  • A. hasPlaceNamedAfter
    Indicates that one place is named in honor of or derived from the name of another place.
  • B. locatedInFormerNamePlace
    Indicates that an entity is located in a place that is referred to by its former or historical name rather than its current name.
  • C. hasTraditionalName chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a name traditionally used or recognized for it, often rooted in long-standing cultural or historical practice.
  • D. hasMetropolitanAreaName
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a metropolitan area identified by a specific name.
  • E. hasHeritageSiteNamedAfter
    Indicates that one entity has a heritage site that is named after another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b1793888190a5f70e4b21dc05a1 completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adc54bbfcc8190bec9c16e3749c3b1 completed March 8, 2026, 6:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adc041a8608190a2d543dab6d2ef6c completed March 8, 2026, 6:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:33 p.m.