Triple

T36965208
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Team Silent E914409 entity
Predicate successorDeveloperOnFranchise P144446 FINISHED
Object Climax Studios NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Climax Studios | Statement: [Team Silent, successorDeveloperOnFranchise, Climax Studios]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorDeveloperOnFranchise
Context triple: [Team Silent, successorDeveloperOnFranchise, Climax Studios]
  • A. successorManufacturer
    Indicates that one manufacturer has taken over, replaced, or continued the role or operations of another manufacturer as its successor.
  • B. wasLaterDevelopedBy
    Indicates that something (such as an idea, product, or work) was created or further developed at a later time by a specified agent or entity.
  • C. laterFranchiseHolder chosen
    Indicates that one entity became the franchise holder of something at a later time than another entity, succeeding the earlier franchise holder.
  • D. developerOfFranchise
    Indicates that an entity is the creator or primary developer responsible for originating or establishing a particular franchise.
  • E. developedBySuccessorTeamOf
    Indicates that something was developed by a team that is the successor to a previous team responsible for an earlier version or related work.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e8c498c8190b2842db80aea8b3b completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a009273634c8190b5b9c87053b56760 completed May 10, 2026, 2:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0092171230819096e4274dd97e0410 completed May 10, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.