Triple
T36964111
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dark Vision |
E914381
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasUpgradeEffect |
P167552
|
FINISHED |
| Object | increases range |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: increases range | Statement: [Dark Vision, hasUpgradeEffect, increases range]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUpgradeEffect Context triple: [Dark Vision, hasUpgradeEffect, increases range]
-
A.
hasUpgrade
Indicates that one entity possesses, includes, or is associated with an improved or enhanced version of another entity.
-
B.
upgradeEffect
chosen
Indicates that one entity causes an improvement or enhancement in the capabilities, performance, or status of another entity.
-
C.
hasUpgradeSystem
Indicates that an entity includes or is equipped with a system for performing upgrades or enhancements.
-
D.
wasUpgradedFor
Indicates that one entity was improved, enhanced, or updated specifically to serve, benefit, or be compatible with another entity.
-
E.
hasUpgradeProject
Indicates that an entity is associated with a project whose purpose is to improve, enhance, or modernize that entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e8c498c8190b2842db80aea8b3b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb563aec448190875410fb1a3ed624 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 2:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb35b9ede881908aaae93a215525df |
completed | May 6, 2026, 12:36 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:14 p.m.