Triple
T3633990
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee v. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission |
E77021
|
entity |
| Predicate | interpretsStatute |
P2241
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act | Statement: [Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee v. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, interpretsStatute, Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: interpretsStatute Context triple: [Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee v. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, interpretsStatute, Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act]
-
A.
statuteInterpreted
chosen
Indicates that a legal authority (such as a court or agency) has provided an interpretation or authoritative reading of a particular statute.
-
B.
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted
Indicates that a specific constitutional provision has been interpreted or given meaning by a judicial or authoritative body in relation to a particular context or case.
-
C.
statuteInvolved
Indicates that a particular statute or legal provision is implicated, referenced, or applied in relation to a given case, event, or legal matter.
-
D.
legislativeIntent
Indicates the purpose, goals, or objectives that lawmakers intended to achieve through a particular law or legislative action.
-
E.
statuteName
Indicates the specific legal statute or act by which something is formally designated, governed, or referenced.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85dd0be48190b738990cb20c4731 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc30594588190856694d4222c90d8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb842be7c8190b7dfdb7c906f294c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:24 p.m.