Triple
T3608558
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | De Ira Dei |
E76430
|
entity |
| Predicate | defendsDoctrine |
P40990
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reality of God’s wrath |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reality of God’s wrath | Statement: [De Ira Dei, defendsDoctrine, reality of God’s wrath]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defendsDoctrine Context triple: [De Ira Dei, defendsDoctrine, reality of God’s wrath]
-
A.
doctrineOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
-
B.
deniesDoctrine
Indicates that one entity rejects, opposes, or refuses to accept the truth or validity of a particular doctrine associated with another entity.
-
C.
defendsConcept
chosen
Indicates that one entity actively supports and argues in favor of a particular concept, idea, or theory, often in response to criticism or challenge.
-
D.
confirmedDoctrine
Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
-
E.
clarifiedDoctrineOn
Indicates that one entity has provided a more precise, authoritative, or detailed explanation of a doctrine concerning another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85da0ba481908b3b48c69efe2b98 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adc22a3cf081908c20b6fb55be0db2 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb83d8b1c8190b3bddbc5dc995a87 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:22 p.m.