Triple

T35686335
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Shentong E1031158 entity
Predicate controversialWithin P198448 FINISHED
Object Gelug school NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gelug school | Statement: [Shentong, controversialWithin, Gelug school]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: controversialWithin
Context triple: [Shentong, controversialWithin, Gelug school]
  • A. controversialBecause
    Indicates that one entity is considered controversial specifically due to, or as a result of, its relationship with or association to another entity.
  • B. controversialStatus
    Indicates that the subject is associated with debate, dispute, or disagreement regarding its acceptance, validity, or appropriateness.
  • C. hasControversialAspect
    Indicates that something includes an element, feature, or aspect that is disputed, debated, or likely to cause disagreement or public criticism.
  • D. controversy
    Indicates a situation in which there is active disagreement, dispute, or public debate between parties over a particular issue, action, or claim.
  • E. controversyType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of controversy associated with an entity or situation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e0bb6608190ad3a1880be54a17d completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fee335cb08819097e3a0e09d5ebf49 completed May 9, 2026, 7:33 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fee2c74fd88190acfc045ab07b7f6b completed May 9, 2026, 7:31 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fee33485188190a43526c9d39e3b6a completed May 9, 2026, 7:33 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:05 p.m.