Triple
T35492536
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Spanish legal system |
E1025767
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasJudicialCouncil |
P183378
|
FINISHED |
| Object | General Council of the Judiciary |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: General Council of the Judiciary | Statement: [Spanish legal system, hasJudicialCouncil, General Council of the Judiciary]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasJudicialCouncil Context triple: [Spanish legal system, hasJudicialCouncil, General Council of the Judiciary]
-
A.
hasJudiciary
Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is under the authority of a judicial body or legal court system.
-
B.
hadJudicialFunction
Indicates that an entity exercised or was assigned an official judicial role, authority, or responsibility in relation to another entity or context.
-
C.
hasJudicialSeat
Indicates that an entity holds an official position or seat within a judicial body or court.
-
D.
hasJudicialOfficer
Indicates that an entity is associated with or served by a specific judicial officer (such as a judge or magistrate) responsible for legal or court-related functions.
-
E.
hasJudge
Indicates that a legal case, proceeding, or decision is presided over or decided by a particular judge.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dfbcdd881908c7b0b6bc502252b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f79f7340e4819092a1a47f7028e63f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f79e4bdbcc8190be7a0d2cf8a77b64 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:13 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f79ec14ce08190b22cee0b40d33743 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:15 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.