Triple
T35129549
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rule 34 – Judgment on the Pleadings |
E1014399
|
entity |
| Predicate | involves |
P1256
|
FINISHED |
| Object | evaluation of sufficiency of answer |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: evaluation of sufficiency of answer | Statement: [Rule 34 – Judgment on the Pleadings, involves, evaluation of sufficiency of answer]
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dd8b6948190aaa32b081816bd94 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78c66345081909bed56b0b3686432 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:02 p.m.