Triple

T3498477
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Yablo's paradox E73906 entity
Predicate usedInArgumentFor P48759 FINISHED
Object existence of non-well-founded reference LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: existence of non-well-founded reference | Statement: [Yablo's paradox, usedInArgumentFor, existence of non-well-founded reference]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedInArgumentFor
Context triple: [Yablo's paradox, usedInArgumentFor, existence of non-well-founded reference]
  • A. usedInType
    Indicates that something serves as a component, element, or example within a particular type or category.
  • B. usedInCase
    Indicates that something (such as an item, method, or piece of information) is employed or applied within a particular case or instance.
  • C. areUsedIn
    Indicates that certain entities serve as components, tools, or resources within a particular process, context, or application.
  • D. usedInSignatureOf
    Indicates that something (such as a type, parameter, or construct) appears as part of the formal signature of a function, method, or similar callable entity.
  • E. isUsedAs
    Indicates that one entity serves a particular function, role, or purpose as another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85cdb6e48190a335d412b9194ed8 completed March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adbbd3ad548190abbfae820bf3b66d completed March 8, 2026, 6:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adae0b34908190b2bb5766a2231f7a completed March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69adb055ed2481908171effe28151cf9 completed March 8, 2026, 5:22 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:18 p.m.