Triple
T34669187
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | B-Spec |
E890331
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDriverProgression |
P98703
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [B-Spec, hasDriverProgression, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDriverProgression Context triple: [B-Spec, hasDriverProgression, true]
-
A.
hasProgressionSystem
chosen
Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a structured system through which progress, advancement, or development can occur over time.
-
B.
hasCareerProgressionTo
Indicates that one role, position, or career stage naturally advances or transitions into another within a professional or occupational path.
-
C.
hasDriver
Indicates that an entity is operated, controlled, or driven by a specific person or agent.
-
D.
hasFormerDriver
Indicates that an entity previously served as a driver for another entity but no longer holds that role.
-
E.
hasDevelopmentDriver
Indicates that one entity serves as a driving factor, cause, or motivator for the development, growth, or advancement of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349d9c59481908b36baa0be093aea |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f722fa31248190a1c9081ce8cfa37b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72157af108190880317a62e634bb0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:20 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:05 a.m.