Triple
T3460067
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Head of the Church of England |
E73001
|
entity |
| Predicate | contestedDoctrine |
P37989
|
FINISHED |
| Object | papal supremacy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: papal supremacy | Statement: [Supreme Head of the Church of England, contestedDoctrine, papal supremacy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: contestedDoctrine Context triple: [Supreme Head of the Church of England, contestedDoctrine, papal supremacy]
-
A.
disputedDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that a particular doctrine, teaching, or belief is contested or not universally accepted between parties.
-
B.
contestedBy
Indicates that one party challenges, disputes, or opposes a claim, decision, or position held by another party.
-
C.
capitalContested
Indicates that the status of being the capital of a region or country is disputed or claimed by multiple parties.
-
D.
doctrineOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
-
E.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85b224d481908ff8be51338d24ff |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adbae5ff848190880fa416a123bc4a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adae041d588190a84a02bca94adec8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:17 p.m.