Triple

T33888990
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Siege of Fort Pulaski E868705 entity
Predicate breach P177877 FINISHED
Object southeast wall of Fort Pulaski LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: southeast wall of Fort Pulaski | Statement: [Siege of Fort Pulaski, breach, southeast wall of Fort Pulaski]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: breach
Context triple: [Siege of Fort Pulaski, breach, southeast wall of Fort Pulaski]
  • A. breachedDuring
    Indicates that one entity violated, broke, or failed to uphold another entity (such as a rule, contract, or security measure) within a specified time period or event.
  • B. break
    Indicates that one entity causes another entity to separate into pieces, stop functioning, or otherwise lose its normal integrity or continuity.
  • C. breachedAt
    Indicates the specific time or point at which a security, contract, or boundary was violated or broken.
  • D. afterBreached
    Indicates that one event or state occurs subsequent to another event or state having been breached or violated.
  • E. broke
    Indicates that one entity caused another entity to separate into pieces or cease functioning, typically through force or damage.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34996761c8190864e42f7c9cf215b completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7051ad6e4819095e82bbd64761803 completed May 3, 2026, 8:19 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f700fe24e08190998e2c96fbaaad38 completed May 3, 2026, 8:02 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f70519f114819080659840c04d7911 completed May 3, 2026, 8:19 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:48 a.m.