Triple

T33761765
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Skolem arithmetic E865123 entity
Predicate hasModels P197425 FINISHED
Object standard model (ℕ, ×) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: standard model (ℕ, ×) | Statement: [Skolem arithmetic, hasModels, standard model (ℕ, ×)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasModels
Context triple: [Skolem arithmetic, hasModels, standard model (ℕ, ×)]
  • A. hasModelSeries
    Indicates a relationship where an item or product is associated with a specific model series it belongs to.
  • B. hasModelStatus
    Indicates that an entity is assigned a particular model-related state or condition, such as its current phase, validity, or operational status within a modeling context.
  • C. numberOfModels
    Indicates the quantity or count of models associated with a given entity or context.
  • D. usesModelsType
    Indicates that one entity employs or relies on a specific type or category of models in its operation or behavior.
  • E. hadModel
    Indicates that an entity possessed, used, or was associated with a particular model (e.g., a product, design, or version) at some point in time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498d3b748190aa3c4006c1f32f38 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe91383a1c81909266e40c3c3ede6c completed May 9, 2026, 1:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe8fde094081908f0f121664fbb5c7 completed May 9, 2026, 1:37 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe9137730c81909d1d57c30566c89a completed May 9, 2026, 1:43 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:45 a.m.