Triple
T33743362
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1885 United Kingdom general election |
E864633
|
entity |
| Predicate | majorElectoralReform |
P51946
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 | Statement: [1885 United Kingdom general election, majorElectoralReform, Redistribution of Seats Act 1885]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: majorElectoralReform Context triple: [1885 United Kingdom general election, majorElectoralReform, Redistribution of Seats Act 1885]
-
A.
changedElectoralSystem
Indicates that an entity has altered or replaced a previously existing electoral system with a different one.
-
B.
electoralReformContext
chosen
Indicates the context or circumstances related to changes or proposed changes in an electoral system or voting rules.
-
C.
typeOfElectoralChange
Indicates the specific kind or category of change that has occurred in an electoral system, process, or outcome.
-
D.
introducedVotingSystemChange
Indicates that an entity initiated or implemented a modification to an existing voting system.
-
E.
reElectionOf
Indicates that an entity is being elected again to a position or office they have previously held.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3498b24b8819096a65009e521d0e1 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff1d85441c8190931e758685a269f7 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff1d186cc48190b315c61e23de6551 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:40 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:44 a.m.